<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jordan Sues Grocery Stores for Trademark Infringement&#8230; After They Congratulate Him!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalip.com/2009/12/31/michael-jordan-sues-grocery-stores-for-trademark-infringement-after-they-congratulate-him/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/12/31/michael-jordan-sues-grocery-stores-for-trademark-infringement-after-they-congratulate-him/</link>
	<description>Harnessing the strategic power of Intellectual Property</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Annals of sports trademarks</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/12/31/michael-jordan-sues-grocery-stores-for-trademark-infringement-after-they-congratulate-him/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Annals of sports trademarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=625#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] achievements. Jordan proceeded to sue them for trademark infringement. [Chicago Breaking Sports, Tactical IP via Legal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] achievements. Jordan proceeded to sue them for trademark infringement. [Chicago Breaking Sports, Tactical IP via Legal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streisand 101 &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/12/31/michael-jordan-sues-grocery-stores-for-trademark-infringement-after-they-congratulate-him/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Streisand 101 &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=625#comment-142</guid>
		<description>[...] The only downside that I see to so educating the next crop of attorneys is that a huge source of entertainment will be snuffed out.&#160; What will we read about for fun when Micheal Jordan&#8217;s attorney convinces him not to sue the people who congratulate him? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The only downside that I see to so educating the next crop of attorneys is that a huge source of entertainment will be snuffed out.&nbsp; What will we read about for fun when Micheal Jordan&#8217;s attorney convinces him not to sue the people who congratulate him? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfischer1975</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/12/31/michael-jordan-sues-grocery-stores-for-trademark-infringement-after-they-congratulate-him/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>jfischer1975</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=625#comment-138</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a great quote in &lt;i&gt;New Kids&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;With many well-known trademarks, such as Jell-O, Scotch tape and Kleenex, there are equally informative non-trademark words describing the products (gelatin, cellophane tape and facial tissue).&#160; But sometimes there is no descriptive substitute, and a problem closely related to genericity and descriptiveness is presented when many goods and services are effectively identifiable only by their trademarks.&#160; For example, one might refer to &quot;the two-time world champions&quot; or &quot;the professional basketball team from Chicago,&quot; but it&#039;s far simpler (and more likely to be understood) to refer to the Chicago Bulls.&#160; In such cases, use of the trademark does not imply sponsorship or endorsement of the product because the mark is used only to describe the thing, rather than to identify its source.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a great quote in <i>New Kids</i>:</p>
<blockquote><p>With many well-known trademarks, such as Jell-O, Scotch tape and Kleenex, there are equally informative non-trademark words describing the products (gelatin, cellophane tape and facial tissue).&nbsp; But sometimes there is no descriptive substitute, and a problem closely related to genericity and descriptiveness is presented when many goods and services are effectively identifiable only by their trademarks.&nbsp; For example, one might refer to &#8220;the two-time world champions&#8221; or &#8220;the professional basketball team from Chicago,&#8221; but it&#8217;s far simpler (and more likely to be understood) to refer to the Chicago Bulls.&nbsp; In such cases, use of the trademark does not imply sponsorship or endorsement of the product because the mark is used only to describe the thing, rather than to identify its source.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
