<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Dat Say They Gonna Sue for Trademark Infringement?&#160; Da NFL – Dat Who!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalip.com/2010/02/02/who-dat-say-they-gonna-sue-for-trademark-infringement-da-nfl-dat-who/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalip.com/2010/02/02/who-dat-say-they-gonna-sue-for-trademark-infringement-da-nfl-dat-who/</link>
	<description>Harnessing the strategic power of Intellectual Property</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: markmalek</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2010/02/02/who-dat-say-they-gonna-sue-for-trademark-infringement-da-nfl-dat-who/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>markmalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=760#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Very interesting Steve.  I will look into that issue and probably write something about it soon.  Just at first glance, it seems as though Fujitsu is arguing that they are the &quot;Senior User&quot; of the iPad and iPhone trademarks.  I&#039;ll bet that Apple will be arguing some sort of ownership interest in the &quot;i&quot; family of marks.  It will probably be a tough argument for Apple because of the number of &quot;i&quot; products out there that they probably do not control, e.g., iHome products for use with Apple products (there is probably a licensing deal in there somewhere though).  Thanks for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting Steve.  I will look into that issue and probably write something about it soon.  Just at first glance, it seems as though Fujitsu is arguing that they are the &#8220;Senior User&#8221; of the iPad and iPhone trademarks.  I&#8217;ll bet that Apple will be arguing some sort of ownership interest in the &#8220;i&#8221; family of marks.  It will probably be a tough argument for Apple because of the number of &#8220;i&#8221; products out there that they probably do not control, e.g., iHome products for use with Apple products (there is probably a licensing deal in there somewhere though).  Thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Whitlock</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2010/02/02/who-dat-say-they-gonna-sue-for-trademark-infringement-da-nfl-dat-who/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Whitlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=760#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, Mark.  Wondering what your thoughts are on Apple&#039;s new iPad.  I understand that Fujitsu (I think) has a hand-held product used for physical inventory counting and it&#039;s called the iPad.  In the same article where I read this, I found that Cisco had an iPhone product long before Apple introduced theirs.  The article said that Apple planned to argue that Fujitsu &quot;under-utilized&quot; their trademark.

Thought this might be an interesting topic for a future newsletter.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, Mark.  Wondering what your thoughts are on Apple&#8217;s new iPad.  I understand that Fujitsu (I think) has a hand-held product used for physical inventory counting and it&#8217;s called the iPad.  In the same article where I read this, I found that Cisco had an iPhone product long before Apple introduced theirs.  The article said that Apple planned to argue that Fujitsu &#8220;under-utilized&#8221; their trademark.</p>
<p>Thought this might be an interesting topic for a future newsletter.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
