By: Mark R. Malek
As you may know, Coca Cola has one of the biggest trademark portfolios in the world and one of the most valuable trademark portfolios. I was told one time that everything that Coca Cola owned could literally burn to the ground and they could start over by taking the trademark portfolio to the bank. I would suspect that the Coca Cola trademark portfolio is worth somewhere in the Billions!
Of course, with a very valuable trademark portfolio comes a desire to protect it. As you can imagine, when Coca Cola found out about an energy drink that is sold in a red can with white lettering called “Cocaine” they got a little concerned. According to this article, Coca Cola filed an opposition to a trademark application for “Cocaine” in Chile. The first question that came to my head was why hadn’t Coca Cola opposed this mark in the United States. This may have been a trademark application that got by them. I do not expect Coca Cola to sit on their hands for this one. I suspect that if “Cocaine” continues to be sold in the US (the energy drink not the illegal drug), then Coke will file a trademark infringement lawsuit to put a stop to it.
I really do not understand this marketing campaign. The energy drink named “Cocaine” markets itself as “The Legal Alternative.” Yes, I am somewhat conservative, but this just doesn’t add up to me. What is the market they are trying to capture? Is it the punk that thinks it would be funny to bring a can of this to school and show his friends? If that is the case, then yes, I see this campaign working….until the kid’s parents get a call from the school administrator telling them that little Johnny has been suspended for having “Cocaine” in school.
A lawsuit that may be brought by Coca Cola will likely be based on trademark dilution. This cause of action is available to owners of famous trademarks, and seeks to prevent others from diluting the value of the famous trademark. I suspect that this would not have gotten on Coca Cola’s radar but for the red can and white lettering. That was probably the fatal move for “Cocaine” energy drinks. As a general rule, try not to mess with the company that has the Billion dollar trademark portfolio and that relies on their trademark portfolio as part of their success.

Comments
Posted On
Apr 16, 2011Posted By
Jamey KirbyDid you just graduate law school or did you get your law degree from a box of Cracker Jacks?
Posted On
Apr 16, 2011Posted By
BethThis is BS. Coca-cola acts like they own the color red.
Posted On
Apr 16, 2011Posted By
Jamey KirbyThere I go being reactionary too! You see, sometimes you need to stop and think.
You cannot trademark colors. Coca-Cola has made such a huge deal out of their font, it would be almost impossible for them to even get a judge to hear an infringement case with respect to our product.
The filing in Chile is not based on infringement, it is on the grounds of morality and unfair competition. If they could have filed infringement, trust me, they would have!
If you go to any dollar store, you will see all sorts of soda pops and colas in red cans with white writing.
Coca-Cola did NOT trademark the name Cocaine… Period…
Posted On
Apr 16, 2011Posted By
Tom“until the kid’s parents get a call from the school administrator telling them that little Johnny has been suspended for having “Cocaine” in school.”
Like the can itself states: “This message is for the people who are too stupid to recognize the obvious. This product does not contain the drug cocaine (duh). This product is not intended to be an alternative to an illicit street drug, and anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.”
I guess you think school administrators are idiots?
Posted On
Apr 16, 2011Posted By
John B.You’re a lawyer??? Did you ever pass the bar??? Not the one that you must have been drinking at before you wrote this piece but the examination to determine whether a candidate is qualified to practice law.
Posted On
Apr 17, 2011Posted By
The task of a new logo, revamp and name.. « mEdIaLoGiCi5 by mj[...] Coca Cola Files Opposition to “Cocaine” Trademark in Chile (tacticalip.com) [...]
Posted On
Apr 17, 2011Posted By
Dan DBy your standards then Coca-Cola has the right to go after anyone with some similar letters in the name. “Coca”ine? Well what about “Cola”. How many “Cola” products are there? RC Cola, Pepsi-Cola. It seems to me that they would be a better target for them to push around and spend their “lawyering” money on. Or is it just the fact that they are jealous because Cocaine is a better tasting drink and can stand all on it’s own just by the taste and the content? Oh, and I understand Cocaine is outselling the Coca-Cola brands energy drink. Awe, gee is that why they are trying to cause such a fuss? That’s ok. Cocaine loves the publicity. Our sales are increasing as a result. Any time a giant tries to throw their weight around and bully a “little guy” the “little guy” gets more notoriety. Oops. Looks like they made a big mistake.
By the way, do your research. Cocaine does NOT market itself as the “Legal Alternative”. Those words were used in the beginning, several years ago, as a joke (again, as Tom said, read the label. What is life, without a little levity). By mutual agreement those words have been removed and are no longer used.
Posted On
Apr 17, 2011Posted By
markmalekWow- who would have thought that such a post would trigger this much emotion. To all who are wondering if I actually went to law school, the answer is no…but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night…actually two nights ago. Here is what I don’t get. It just sonds as though most of you disagree with Coke’s tactics. As our readers know, we come down on Trademark Bullies pretty hard on this site. What is it about my statement of the LAW that you disagree with. Probably the only thing I left out is a possible cause of action for Tradedress infringement.
Posted On
Apr 25, 2011Posted By
It’s The Real Thing Coke Rewards Help Great Causes and One of My Favorites, Our Marine Corps -Toy’s For Tots | Taking On A Cause by Patsy McCaw-Yager,Englewood, Fl.[...] Coca Cola Files Opposition to “Cocaine” Trademark in Chile (tacticalip.com) [...]