Posts Tagged ‘inventor’

Share via email

By: Mark R. Malek

I was reading through my daily update this morning from Patently-O and noticed a bulletin that the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences has changed it’s name to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).  Dennis Crouch indicated that this information was obtained from this alert.

This is just one of the many change that is coming from the America Invents Act (AIA).  The change is not due to a desire to have a different name.  Not by a long shot.  This is a product of the First to File system that is coming into place.  Interferences were a tool that currently can be used by inventors when two different entities invented the same thing at around the same time.  In short, when two applications were pending that were directed to the same invention, one party can request that an “interference” be declared.  After an interference is declared, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) would determine who was the “first to invent.”

Well, the AIA does away with “first to invent” and moves the United States to a “first to file” system.  In that case, we don’t need interferences any more.  The protection goes to the inventor that filed their application first.  Yes, yes, I am very much so simplifying this, but I just wanted to let you know that this is more than just a desire to change names.  The PTAB will still be carrying out many of the other functions that the BPAI carried out, i.e., appeals of Examiner’s decisions, appeals of reexaminations, inter partes review, post grant review, etc.

Many of these changes are set to take effect on September 16, 2012.  Here at the firm, the patent department is gearing up for the changes. I will be posting more on what inventors need to be on the lookout for as many of the provisions of AIA are implemented.

Share via email

By: Mark R. Malek

Challenge.gov has issued yet another challenge.  This time it is directed to software developers.  According to this post, NYC Media Lab is challenging developers to drive media innovations by mashing up APIs, feeds and data from New York City media and technology companies.

This is just a short post to alert our readers of the potential prize.  Please let us know if you wind up submitting something.  We are always just a little curious as to whether or not our readers are benefiting from us keeping an eye on these types of things.

Share via email

By: Mark R. Malek

The Florida Regional Independent Inventors Conference will be held on April 27 and 28 in Tampa, Florida.  “Senior USPTO officials, successful inventors and intellectual property experts will be on hand to provide a wealth of practical advice and information for novice and seasoned inventors.”  For more information on the conference please see this link at the USPTO.

“A pre-conference workshop on April 26 from 5-7 p.m. is included in the registration fee. It will cover the basics of the patent process. If you cannot attend, this session will be repeated as a breakout session on April 27.”  This is a great opportunity for inventors to get a lot of great information about the patent process.  Zies Widerman & Malek encourages our readers to attend the conference.

 

 

Share via email

By: Mark R. Malek

As many of our readers know, there is a somewhat significant backlog in patent examination right now. For example, the average time to get a patent allowed now is about 33 months.  You can reference the patent dashboard for more information.  I know that this sounds terrible, but it is a huge improvement, and things are going the right way.  For example, the patent backlog is down to 657,000 now – which is significantly lower than the 900,000 that I remember.

There are ways to try to shortcut the long wait associated with with the patent examination process, provided that the Applicant meets certain criteria.  I will be writing about many of these options over the next several posts, but the one that I wanted to discuss first is based on the age of the inventor.  Inventors over the age of 65 can advance examination of their patent application out of turn.  This is outlined in the Manual of Patent Examination Procedures (MPEP) Section 708.02.  Maybe it is because I am getting older, but I just don’t think that 65 is that old, but if the Patent Office sees fit to provide a benefit to inventors over the age of 65 – take it!

So what exactly does it mean to file a petition to make special?  In short, the Patent Office is offering to grant “special status” to an application that has a named inventor that is over the age of 65. Imagine that a patent Examiner’s desk might have a stack of papers on it that is about 3 feet high.  That stack of papers represents patent applications that still need to be examined.  Now imagine that the application you just submitted is on the bottom of that stack.  After the Patent Examiner receives the approved petition to make special based on the age of the inventor, your application is taken from the bottom of the stack and put right on top.  This is a very simplistic explanation, but this type of petition will likely provide an examination that lasts only about a year.

The biggest advantage to this type of petition is that it is completely free.  Once you receive a filing receipt, simply fill in the form and file it.  Another huge advantage is that this type of petition is automatically processed.  In other words, there is no need to wait for the petitions branch at the Patent Office to make a decision on the petition (sometimes taking upwards of three weeks or so).  A really good write-up on the procedure is available from the Patent Office here.

This petition can be submitted even if just one of the inventors on a patent application is over the age of 65.  It is imperative, however, not to try to trick the system.  Please do not just name someone who is over the age of 65 as an inventor for the sake of filing the petition.  This will likely lead to all sorts of headaches down the road when trying to enforce the patent.  For example, you do not want to run into an accusation that you have committed fraud on the patent office by naming someone over the age of 65 as an inventor when they truly are not an inventor. This could lead to invalidation of your patent.  In order to be named an inventor, one has to have had something to do with at least one of the claims that are allowed in a patent application (more on this in a future post).

As I will discuss in later posts, there are several other ways to accelerate examination of a patent application, but none as convenient, fast, and hassle free as a petition to make special based on age.

Share via email

By: Mark R. Malek

One of the things that I have encountered over the years is an inventor that comes up with an incredible invention, but that does not know what to do with the invention in order to make money with it.  During my consultations, I generally break down the very complicated business side of inventing to the three most common ways that I believe the inventor can make profit from an invention.  Of course, this article assumes that the invention is patentable, will eventually be granted a patent, and does not infringe on someone else’s patent (many assumptions, but I will discuss those in a future post.)

The first way that I know how to make money on your invention is to manufacture it and sell it yourself.  Why do you need a patent to do that?  To tell you the truth, you don’t.  There is no requirement for you to patent your invention in order to sell it. If, however, you start selling your invention, or otherwise disclose it, and one year passes, you can kiss any hope of getting a patent goodbye.  Suppose that obtaining a patent is not that important to you.  That’s fine, but I guarantee that it becomes important to you once your invention starts getting knocked off and there is no reasonable remedy to stop the knock offs.  Also, one thing that I have notices about trying to launch your own product, i.e., trying to manufacture the product and get the product into a distribution chain, is that the patent is usually the cheap part.  Depending on the invention, just getting manufacturing set up can be extraordinarily expensive.

The second and third ways that I suggest profiting from an  invention does require a patent, or some other protectable right.  Way number two to make profit from an invention is to license a patent covering the invention.  This is usually the case when an inventor can come to terms with an entity or person that desires to make, use or sell an invention that is covered by the inventor’s patent.  In such a case, the two parties can enter into a licensing agreement.  A licensing agreement is an agreement that allows the inventor to maintain ownership of the patent, and grant rights to another to use the patent for some sort of compensation (or other consideration) and for a fixed amount of time.  Licensing agreements are not something that are scratched on the back of a Denny’s napkin in crayon.  They are very complicated, and require a great amount of detail.  If you find yourself in a position where you are shaking hands in a bar and thinking that you have just saved money on your licensing negotiation by not using an attorney, chances are you will be using an attorney in the not to distant future – in a much more expensive lawsuit.

The third way to profit from an invention is an outright sale of your rights to the invention.  This, almost always, involves the sale of a patent.  I have had many conversations with inventors that want to skip the patent process and just go right to the big company (say Johnson & Johnson, for example) and sell their invention for millions.  Really?  What would Johnson & Johnson be purchasing?  The inventor’s thoughts?  It doesn’t really work that way.  An invention inside of one’s head does not result in a protectable right.  Johnson & Johnson does not have any reason to pay for the invention because there is no protectable right in that invention until a patent is granted on it.  Put another way, there are no lawsuits for idea infringement, but there can be a lawsuits for patent infringement.  The above simplistic outline does not discuss other legal remedies, such as theft of trade secret, for example, but that is not really applicable to this situation.

There are several other ways, some more complicated, to profit from an invention.  I will continue to write on this topic, as well as provide some additional details of the above in future posts.  This is just a short intro to satisfy some of the common questions that inventors sometimes have.


Subscribe

Login



SATURDAY, MAY 18, 2013

Bad Behavior has blocked 7957 access attempts in the last 7 days.